Skip to main content

Volume 25, Issue 4 (1995) Symposium on Communications Law and Regulation in the 21st Century

Editorial Board

Board of Editors - Vol. 25, No. 4 1995

Table of Contents

Table of Contents - Vol. 25, No. 4 1995

Articles

Convergence in Communications Technology and the First Amendment
John J. Gibbons

Domestic and International Copyright Issues Implicated in the Compilation of a Multimedia Product
Jane C. Ginsburg

Public, Educational, and Governmental Acces on Cable Television: A Model to Assure Reasonable Access to the Information Superhighway for All People in Fulfillment of the First Amendment Guarantee of Free Speech
James N. Horwood

First Amendment Issues Presented by the "Information Superhighway"
Norman Redlich and David R. Lurie

Speech

E Pluribus Unum - From Many, One: In Unity There is Strength
Paula A. Franzese

Comments

Controlling Guns: A Call for Consistency in Judicial Review of Challenges to Gun Control Legislation
Michelle Capezza

New Jersey's Recent Employment Manual Decisions: Traditional Contract Law Abandoned in Favor of an Employee's Unreasonable Expectations
Keith J. Rosenblatt

Notes

Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Injunction Provisions Establishing Both a Thirty-Six-Foot Buffer Zone Around an Abortion Clinic Entrance and Driveway and Limited Noise Restrictions Do Not Violate the First Amendment, but Other Provisions of the Injunction Are Unconstitutional - Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., 114 S. Ct. 2516 (1994).
Ben A. Montenegro

Constitutional Law - Fourteenth Amendment - The Fourth Amendment, Rather Than Substantive Due Process, Must Be Used to Judge a § 1983 Claim Alleging a Violation of an Individual's Right to Freedom from Prosecution Without Probable Cause - Albright v. Oliver, 114 S. Ct. 807 (1994).
Michael T. Carton

Evidence - Privileged Communications - The Marital Communications Privilege Does Not Preclude a Third Party from Testifying as to the Contents of a Written Interspousal Communication and the Priest Is the Sole Holder of the Priest-Penitent Privilege and Can Waive That Privilege Without the Consent of the Penitent - State v. Szemple, 135 N.J. 406, 640 A.2d 817 (1994).
Kristina K. Pappa

Survey

Survey of Recent Developments in New Jersey Law

Select an issue:

Search

Advanced Search