Evidence - Privileged Communications - The Marital Communications Privilege Does Not Preclude a Third Party from Testifying as to the Contents of a Written Interspousal Communication and the Priest Is the Sole Holder of the Priest-Penitent Privilege and Can Waive That Privilege Without the Consent of the Penitent - State v. Szemple, 135 N.J. 406, 640 A.2d 817 (1994).

Authors

Kristina K. Pappa

Recommended Citation

Pappa, Kristina (1995) "Evidence - Privileged Communications - The Marital Communications Privilege Does Not Preclude a Third Party from Testifying as to the Contents of a Written Interspousal Communication and the Priest Is the Sole Holder of the Priest-Penitent Privilege and Can Waive That Privilege Without the Consent of the Penitent - State v. Szemple, 135 N.J. 406, 640 A.2d 817 (1994).," Seton Hall Law Review: Vol. 25 : Iss. 4 , Article 11.
Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/shlr/vol25/iss4/11