Volume 33, Issue 4 (2003)
Editorial Board
Table of Contents
Symposium
The Merits of the Paternalistic Justification for Restrictions on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence
Joseph Sanders
The Gatekeeping Role in Civil Litigation and the Abdication of Legal Values in Favor of Scientific Values
Neil B. Cohen
Daubert Asks the Right Questions: Now Appellate Courts Should Help Find the Right Answers
Christopher B. Mueller
Admissibility Standards as Politics: The Imperial Gate Closers Arrive!!!
Michael F. Baumeister and Dorothea M. Capone
Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture
Richard D. Friedman
The Supreme Court's "Criminal" Daubert Cases
Paul C. Giannelli
Daubert on a Tilted Playing Field
Roger C. Park
Battle of the Standards for Experts in Criminal Cases: Police vs. Psychologists
Jennifer L. Groscup and Stephen d. Penrod
The Legal and Scientific Evaluation of Forensic Science (Especially Fingerprint Expert Testimony)
Michael J. Saks
A Comment on the Admissibility of Forensic Evidence
R. Erik Lillquist
Comments
The Circumvention of Compulsory Arbitration: Two Bites at the Apple, or a Restoration of Employees' Statutory Rights?
Joseph A. Arnold
Undermining and Unintwining: The Right to a Jury Trial and Rule 12(b)(1)
Stefania A. Di Trolio
