Skip to main content

Volume 10, Issue 3 (2000)

The Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal ceased publication in 2002.

Editorial Board

Editorial Board - Vol. 10, No. 3 Summer 2000

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Symposium

Municipal Anti-Gun Lawsuits: How Questionable Litigation Substitutes for Legislation
James H. Warner

Is the Right to Bear Arms Individual, Collective, Insurrectionist or All of the Above?
Ariel A. Rodríguez

Bench Opinion on the Second Amendment
John W. Bissell

Panelist
Stephen P. Halbrook

Panelist
David Yassky

Panelist
Joyce Lee Malcolm

Panelist
Jonathan E. Lowy

Moderator Comments
Ronald Riccio

Commentary
Randy Barnett

Commentary
Alfred J. Lechner Jr.

Commentary
Harold A. Ackerman

Concluding Remarks
Ronald Riccio

Article

The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995: A Whittling Away of State Dilution Statutes
K. Keith Facer

Comments

Freedom, Information, Security
Ronald Backes

Miranda Under Fire
Jonathan L.H. Blaine

Justice, Take Two: The Continuing Debate Over Cameras in the Courtroom
Joshua Sarner

Nonparent Visitation Rights v. Family Autonomy: An Abridgment of Parents' Constitutional Rights?
Elizabeth Weiss

Casting a Net Over the Net: Attempts to Protect Children in Cyberspace
Jennifer Zwick

Casenotes

Fourteenth Amendment - Due Process - A High Speed Police Pursuit with Deliberate Indifference to the Survival of the Suspect's Passenger Is Not Sufficient to Meet the Shocks-the-Conscience Test and Therefore Does Not Violate the Substantive Due Process Provision of the Fourteenth Amendment - County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 118 S.Ct. 1708 (1998).
Carly DeRubeis

Article VI - Supremacy Clause - Preemption - Federalism - Maritime Law - Environmental Law - Title II of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act as Interpreted by Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co. Preempts Washington's Oil Tanker Regulations Concerning General Navigation Watch Procedures, English Language Proficiency, Training, and Casualty Reporting - United States v. Locke, 120 S.Ct. 1135 (2000).
Timothy E. McCarthy

Surveys

Article III - Standing - Although a Private Individual Has Standing to Assert a Qui Tam Action Under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, He Is Proscribed From Asserting Such an Action Against a State or State Agency - Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens, No. 98-1828, 120 S. Ct. 1858, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3428 (May 22, 2000).
Joanna Patricia Piorek

Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments - Prosecutor's Comments Intimating That Defendant Had the Opportunity to Alter His Testimony in Accordance with Other Witness Testimony Did Not Violate Defendant's Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and Due Process Rights - Portuondo v. Agard, 120 S.Ct. 1119, 1128 (2000).
Michael Polloway

The Constitution of the United States

The Constitution of the United States of America