Date of Award
Winter 12-13-2016
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
MS Experimental Psychology
Department
Psychology
Advisor
Susan Teague, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Susan Nolan, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Paige Fisher, Ph.D.
Keywords
persuasion, attitude change, ingroup, outgroup, rational, emotional, message framing
Abstract
Ingroup and outgroup research has largely focused on why differing attitudes toward the ingroup and outgroup exist. Additionally, persuasion research has focused on the construction of persuasive messages using primarily central routes to persuasion (rational messages) more than peripheral (emotional messages) even though research does support that emotional argumentation is an effective method of persuasion. The current study sought to combine these ideas by observing the most effective method to persuade ingroup and outgroup members through rational and emotional message framing. Persuasive messages were presented to participants that 1) either favored the participant’s ingroup or outgroup and 2) used either rational or emotional message framing. Results indicated that the race of communicator led to different levels of persuasion and believability, but that message framing did not. Specifically, Black-targeted messages resulted in higher believability and persuasion than White-targeted messages based on White participant responses.
Recommended Citation
Finnegan, Andrew, "Differential Effects of Rational and Emotional Framing on Ingroup and Outgroup Persuasion" (2016). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 2228.
https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2228