Constitutional Law - First Amendment - A Non-Neutral Law Proscribing Religious Animal Sacrifice That Is Not Generally Applicable Is Not Narrowly Tailored to Serve a Compelling Government Interest Where Such Law Fails to Prohibit Non-Religious Conduct Resulting in Similar Harms Sought to be Addressed - Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 113 S. Ct. 2217 (1993).

Authors

Diane Schulze

Recommended Citation

Schulze, Diane (1994) "Constitutional Law - First Amendment - A Non-Neutral Law Proscribing Religious Animal Sacrifice That Is Not Generally Applicable Is Not Narrowly Tailored to Serve a Compelling Government Interest Where Such Law Fails to Prohibit Non-Religious Conduct Resulting in Similar Harms Sought to be Addressed - Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 113 S. Ct. 2217 (1993).," Seton Hall Law Review: Vol. 24 : Iss. 3 , Article 17.
Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/shlr/vol24/iss3/17