Evidence - Hypnosis - Unconstitutional for State to Apply Per Se Rule to Exclude Criminal Defendant's Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony. Rock v. Arkansas, 107 S. Ct. 2704 (1987).

Authors

Diane C. Nardone

Recommended Citation

Nardone, Diane (1988) "Evidence - Hypnosis - Unconstitutional for State to Apply Per Se Rule to Exclude Criminal Defendant's Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony. Rock v. Arkansas, 107 S. Ct. 2704 (1987).," Seton Hall Law Review: Vol. 18 : Iss. 4 , Article 16.
Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/shlr/vol18/iss4/16